Fernando reposted a blog post that a pastor had written that questioned the accepted understanding of a passage in scripture based on grammatical mood. See the link if you want to read more, my intent isn't to try and open another discussion on that topic, but to raise another question: In our (man's) exegesis of scripture, we learn more of God. Indeed, stated purposes of scripture are teaching and "thoroughly equipping":
2Tim 3:16-17 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
Another facet of God is that he reveals details about Himself, His plans, and actions when He so chooses:
Acts 1:6-7 So when they met together, they asked him, "Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel?" He said to them: "It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority.
There are several other passages that show that same theme. Doesn't it logically follow, then, that our understanding of God, is subject to change as He reveals more of Himself to us?
In other words, is the canon, and therefore God, as static as we've been taught?